Change Management: Revision Notes
Condensed notes for revision. Cover the right side and explain each cue in the left column; fold the page at the dashed line to test yourself.
1Concepts and success factors
Recall
- Change vs transition (Bridges)
- Types: scale, planning, object, trigger
- Implementation vs adoption
- Performance dip; fatigue
- Sponsorship (Prosci)
- “70% fail”: unsupported
Change management is the structured approach to the people side of moving from a current to a future state. Bridges separates change (external shift) from transition (internal adjustment); most failures neglect transition. Change varies by scale (incremental or transformational), planning (planned or emergent), object (structure, process, technology, culture) and trigger (reactive or proactive). Success is adoption, not implementation. Expect a temporary performance dip, and manage change fatigue through prioritisation and pacing.
Failure causes: unclear case, invisible sponsors, no involvement, one-way communication, unprepared middle managers, misaligned systems and early victory claims. Prosci’s research finds active, visible sponsorship the top success factor. The “70% of changes fail” claim has no solid evidence (Hughes, 2011).
2People and resistance
Recall
- Change curve stages
- Bridges: ending, neutral zone, new beginning
- Individual vs organisational resistance
- Resistance as information
- Kotter & Schlesinger six approaches
The change curve (adapted from Kübler-Ross) runs shock, denial, frustration, low point, experimentation, decision, integration: inform early, support at the dip, train and show quick wins during experimentation. Bridges’ phases: ending (acknowledge losses), neutral zone (structure and frequent communication), new beginning (celebrate and reinforce).
Individual resistance comes from habit, security, economic fears, fear of the unknown and selective perception; organisational resistance from structural inertia, group norms and threats to expertise, power and resources. Resistance often reveals design flaws.
Kotter and Schlesinger (1979): education and communication (lack of information), participation (others have needed information or power), facilitation and support (fear and adjustment), negotiation (a powerful group loses, such as a union), manipulation and co-optation (risky), coercion (speed essential; damages trust).
3Models
Recall
- Lewin 1947; force field
- Kotter 8 steps (1995/96); Accelerate 2014
- ADKAR barrier point
- 7S (hard vs soft)
- Appreciative Inquiry 4-D
- Which model when
Lewin (1947): unfreeze, change, refreeze; force-field analysis says reducing restraining forces works better than pushing harder. Kotter: urgency, guiding coalition, vision, communicate, empower by removing obstacles, short-term wins, consolidate (don’t declare victory early), institutionalise; Accelerate (2014) runs steps concurrently through volunteer networks. ADKAR (Prosci, Hiatt): Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement; fix the first weak element (barrier point). McKinsey 7S (1980): strategy, structure, systems (hard) and shared values, style, staff, skills (soft). Appreciative Inquiry (Cooperrider and Srivastva, 1987): Discover, Dream, Design, Destiny; best for culture and engagement. Use Kotter to lead, ADKAR to track adoption, Bridges for the human transition.
Supervisors know the new attendance system but avoid using it because it exposes overtime padding. Which ADKAR element is the barrier?
Show answer
Desire. More training won’t help; address consequences and incentives.
4Roles and communication
Recall
- Sponsor ABCs
- Sponsorship spine
- Middle managers
- HR’s role
- Power–interest grid
- Communication principles
The sponsor follows Prosci’s ABCs: Active and visible, Build a coalition, Communicate directly. The sponsorship spine (sponsor → leaders → middle managers → employees) breaks at any unconvinced link; middle managers translate change into daily work. HR runs impact and stakeholder analysis, communication and training, manager toolkits, reward alignment, union consultation and adoption measurement. A power–interest grid decides whom to manage closely, keep satisfied, keep informed or monitor.
Communicate why before what, answer “what does this mean for me”, start early, repeat across channels, make it two-way and let managers carry personal implications; in plants, use local languages face to face.
5Unionised workplaces and mergers
Recall
- IR Code s.40: 21 days
- Third Schedule matters
- Settlements
- Tata Steel ~78k → ~44k
- M&A phases
- Bank mergers, HDFC, Air India–Vistara
Under IR Code section 40 (formerly ID Act s.9A), changes in Third Schedule matters (wages, allowances, PF contributions, hours, leave, shifts beyond standing orders, grades, customary privileges, discipline rules, rationalisation likely to cause retrenchment, headcount) need 21 days’ notice, and are restricted during pending proceedings. Big shop-floor changes are traded in settlements. Tata Steel cut its workforce from about 78,000 to 44,000 over roughly fifteen years through negotiated voluntary separation without major conflict.
In M&A, HR handles due diligence (liabilities, unions, talent, culture), day-one readiness and retention, harmonisation of job architecture, pay, titles, benefits and seniority, and culture integration. Indian examples: PSU bank consolidation (2019–20), HDFC–HDFC Bank (2023) and Air India–Vistara (2024), where pilot seniority and pay were flashpoints.
New shift system in a unionised plant: steps?
Show answer
Data-based case, early informal union talks, 21-day notice, joint design committee (transport, canteen, women’s night safeguards), pilot, review, roll out (possibly via settlement), shop-floor communication.
6Measurement and cases
Recall
- Readiness, ADKAR, adoption, outcomes, people impact
- Leading vs lagging
- Microsoft, United Airlines, McDonald’s
Measure readiness before launch, ADKAR progress by group, adoption (leading indicators such as system use and helpdesk trends), outcomes (lagging business results) and people impact (engagement, attrition, grievances).
Cases: Microsoft under Nadella moved to a growth-mindset culture led from the top and reinforced in performance management; United Airlines (2018) paused a plan to replace bonuses with a lottery within days after backlash, showing the cost of changing pay without involvement; McDonald’s “Made For You” (1998) slowed service and didn’t fit operational capability (the compendium’s 60% turnover figure is unsupported).